MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7056254772

The Effect of Soil Gradation and Addition of Natural Fibres on the Mechanical Properties and Freeze-Thaw Durability of On-Site Manufactured Compressed Earth Blocks

2020· dissertation· en· W7056254772 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexural strengthCompressive strengthDurabilityGradationCompression (physics)BendingEarth (classical element)Natural (archaeology)Block (permutation group theory)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Implementation of sustainable materials is becoming an imperative consideration in modern building because of the impact of the construction industry on climate change patterns. Building with earth is an ancient technique common in many warm regions and developing countries due to its low cost, and is garnering attention for applications in cold regions due to its favorable hygrothermal properties, ease of use, and low embodied energy. The compressed earth blocks (CEBs) in this project were manufactured on-site by an experienced builder in Cobourg, Ontario, Canada using a combination of various soil gradations and locally sourced natural fibres (Phragmites, straw, switchgrass, and rice hulls). Approximately 280 CEBs were tested in direct compression and three-point bending at ambient conditions, saturated conditions, and after being subjected to six and twelve freeze-thaw conditioning cycles. Results showed that blocks constructed with about 20% gravel particles had up to a 29.3% increase in compressive strength and up to a 71.4% increase in flexural strength than blocks constructed with soil containing only sand, silt, and clay particles. The addition of natural fibres was more beneficial for the compressive strength. In general, blocks produced with the larger quantities of fibres had significantly reduced compressive and flexural strengths than the blocks produced with lower quantities of fibres. The addition of 0.5% of Phragmites fibres resulted in a strength of 7.5 ± 0.34 MPa when added in combination with the gravel particles. The corresponding flexural strength of this block type was 1.56 ± 0.36 MPa which was 11.4% less than the flexural strength obtained using gravel particles and no fibres. Blocks produced with 0.125% straw achieved the highest compressive strength of 8.96 ± 0.71 MPa and blocks produced without fibres had the highest flexural strength of 1.34 ± 0.23 MPa of that investigation. After subjecting the CEBs to six and twelve freeze-thaw cycles, the blocks showed strength retentions of up to 140% for both the compressive and flexural strengths. The moisture absorbed by the blocks during the cycling process appeared to have allowed for additional curing of the blocks, resulting in the increased capacity of the CEBs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→