Estudos brasileiros no Canadá: a chegada de uma nova era? <p> Brazilian studies in Canada: dawn of a new era?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Portugues<p align="justify">Desde os dias sombrios do Bombardier - Embraer e do boicote da carne de gado brasileiro no final dos anos 90, as relações entre Canadá e Brazil tiveram uma significante melhora. Isto pode ser verificado em vários setores, do acadêmico (como pode ser testemunhado pelo estabelecimento de uma cadeira como visitante de pesquisa em estudos Brasileiros),ao político (no crescente número de delegações de parlamentares brasileiras visitando o Canadá), ao econômico (evidenciado pela recente ascensão do investimento bilateral, especialmente em cimento, bebidas e aço) e ao cultural (demonstrado no gosto canadense pela música, cerveja e comida brasileiras). Neste trabalho, nós examinamos se e como tais desenvolvimentos têm sido acompanhados por um aumento na pesquisa acadêmica canadense sobre o Brasil nos últimos anos, especialmente em setores de investigação menos tradicionais, tais como o da política e da economia. Concluímos o trabalho com uma avaliação das futuras necessidades e capacidades na área de Estudos Brasileiros neste país. </p>English</p><p align="justify">Since the dark days of the Bombardier - Embraer and Brazilian beef debacles in the late 1990s, Canada-Brazil relations have taken a remarkable upturn. This is manifest in a broad array of sectors, from the academic (as witnessed by the establishment of the Canada Visiting Research Chair in Brazilian Studies), to the political (in the increased number of visiting Brazilian parliamentary delegations), the economic (evidenced by the recent rise in bilateral investment, especially in cement, beverage, and steel sectors) and the cultural (demonstrated in the nascent Canadian taste for Brazilian music, beer and food). In this paper, we examine whether and how such developments have been accompanied by an increase in academic research in Canada on Brazil in recent years, especially in non-traditional sectors of investigation, such as politics and economics. The paper concludes with an assessment of future needs and capacities in the Brazilian studies field in this country. </p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".