Effect of Pasture and Lipid Supplementation on Production Performance, Carcass Quality, Fatty Acid Composition and Lipid Metabolism of Lamb
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The significance of diet during the growing and finishing of lambs on production and lipid metabolism was studied. Thirty-two intact 5-6 month old Suffolk cross ram lambs that had previously grazed either red clover (RC) or tall fescue (TF) were finished on a concentrate diet containing isolipidic supplements of either fish oil (FO), soybean oil (SBO) or a 30:70 mixture of CLA isomers and SBO (CLA+). When compared to TF, RC increased carcass weight (1.1-fold) and content of muscle ALA, subcutaneous adipose ALA and total PUFA (1.2-fold), and decreased D9D expression in liver (1.6-fold). FO decreased carcass weight (1.1-fold) and increased muscle and subcutaneous adipose EPA (5.6- and 10.8-fold), DHA (5.8- and 13-fold) and total PUFA (1.4- and 1.2-fold) while decreasing SREBP (1.6-fold) expression in liver and SPOT14 and leptin expression in enteric adipose. CLA+ increased subcutaneous adipose CLA isomers (1.8-fold) with no effect on carcass weight or gene expression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".