MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7056351268

Evaluation of the impact of COVID-19 factors on income inequality in the European Union.

2022· dissertation· en· W7056351268 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueKTUePubl (Repository of Kaunas University of Technology) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomic inequalityInequalityChinaEconomic impact analysisIncome distributionIncome inequality metricsQuarter (Canadian coin)Measures of national income and output
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Coronavirus, also known as COVID-19, orginated in China and within a few months has rapidly widespread around the world. With the start of the second quarter of 2020, the anxiety and uncertainity about the unknown virus has put pressure on countries in the world. Questions about the COVID-19 were arising: how many cases and deaths of COVID-19 the world can expect, how long it will last and what impact COVID-19 pandemic will have on the world‘s economy. The growing number of COVID-19 cases encouraged countries around the world to take action to prevent the spread of the virus. Preventing actions like wearing facemasks, restricting movements between countries, banning entertainment (such as concerts, various performances, sports) and many more were taken. Such restrictions led to a slowdown in economic activity. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic can be assessed from a variety of economic measurements and indicators, but income inequality has long been one of the most threatening trends in the global economy and one of the most pressing issues in today‘s world. Thus, the aim of this study is to analyze how COVID-19 affected income inequality. In the theoretical part, the analysis of economic indicators‘ changes shows that COVID-19 has quite a big impact on economic indicators. That is why it is very importatnt to analyze the relationship between COVID-19 and income inequality. The theory analyzes the definition of income inequality by both foreign and Lithuanian authors, as well as the impact of income inequality on economic growth. Theoretical part also analyzes measurements of income inequality as well as presents major COVID-19 factors influencing income inequality. Various concepts and definitions are used in order to define income inequality in different contexts, and there are also many reasons for income inequality. For example, tax systems, unemployment, limited access to education, unequal distribution of wealth and many others. Rising income inequality can lead to financial crises, increase personal and institutional debts, change people‘s communication with other members of society and slowdown the economic growth. Correlation and regression analyzes are used in order to analyze the impact of COVID-19 on income inequality in European Union countries. The study examines how COVID-19 factors such as working from home, cases and deaths from COVID-19 and household savings influenced income inequality in EU.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it