Empowering Teachers to Change Youth Practices: Evaluating Teacher\nDelivery and Responses to the FLHE Programme in Edo State, Nigeria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
School-based programming is one of the most common approaches to\nHIV/AIDS prevention among youth. This paper presents the history and\ndevelopment of the Family Life and HIV Education (FLHE) programme in\nEdo State, Nigeria and results of evaluation of teacher actions and\nresponses to training in its delivery. Results indicate that teachers\nbenefited from the training, were aware of new and/or existing teaching\nresources and began to teach about HIV/AIDS. Teachers expressed that\nthe programme facilitated open dialogue about HIV/AIDS. However, given\nlimited human resources, FLHE was viewed as additional work to already\noverloaded teaching schedules. It is recommended that the Ministry of\nEducation channel resources to enhance teachers' efforts towards\ncombating HIV/AIDS. To facilitate learning about sexual health and\nfamily life, it is recommended that FLHE-based training be viewed as\nthe first rather than the only step towards teacher professional\ndevelopment in this area (Afr J Reprod Health 2012 (Special Edition);\n16[2]: 87-102).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".