MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7056420198

Effect of repeated onabotulinum toxin a injection into the salivary glands: an ultrasound measurement and a treatment for sialorrhea in familial dysautonomia

2015· dissertation· en· W7056420198 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University Health Centre
KeywordsDroolingSialorrheaFamilial dysautonomiaDysautonomiaBotulinum toxinPopulationProspective cohort study
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Sialorrhea or drooling has many clinical and functional complications such as choking, aspiration and skin breakdown in a population where the majority are patients with neurological disabilities (e.g. cerebral palsy, children with developmental delay). In addition there are psychosocial issues (e.g. isolation). There are several ways to treat drooling, ranging from medication to surgical intervention. A novel effective treatment using Onabotulinum Toxin A (Botox® - OBTXA) is currently available. Although this method is effective, it improves symptoms temporarily and its long term efficacy and safety are unknown. There are currently no radiologic studies examining the effect of repeated injections in human salivary glands nor studies demonstrating a safe, therapeutical treatment for drooling control in Familial Dysautonomia (FD). FD is a genetic disease affecting mainly the autonomic nervous system. Drooling control is difficult in this population as other management options are contraindicated due to their potential side effects. Objective: The overall objective of this thesis was 1) to assess the efficacy of repetitive use of OBTXA in salivary glands of children for the treatment of hypersalivation, and 2) to determine whether Botox is a good long term solution for drooling control. The thesis aimed to determine:1.Whether sialorrhea is associated with changes in either parotid or submandibular glands.2.To determine if gland size changes during OBTXA treatment3.To assess whether OBTXA is a safe treatment for sialorrhea in FD. Materials and methods: First, a prospective study compared the size of the salivary glands between drooling and non-drooling patients in one cohort (n = 36 salivary glands). Parotid and submandibular gland surface area, ML and AP dimensions were measured by ultrasound guidance in one session. Second, a prospective study compared the size of the salivary glands between drooling patients treated with repetitive OBTXA injections and a control group. Third, a retrospective case report study of three children with FD who underwent OBTXA injection to treat sialorrhea.Results: The parotid and submandibular salivary glands in the paediatric population do not differ in size in drooling and non-drooling children. However, the salivary glands decrease in size after repetitive OBTXA treatment. Intraglandular OBTXA treatments in FD patients reduced the frequency and severity of sialorrhea.Conclusions: There is no difference in the size of the salivary glands in drooling and non-drooling children. We found that the salivary glands decrease in size during treatment with OBTXA. Measuring the glands at baseline and after Onabotulinum toxin A (OBTXA) injections allows evaluation of treatment-related size changes in the gland. Moreover, OBTXA was found to be a safe and effective therapeutic treatment for sialorrhea control in Familial Dysautonomia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→