MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7056448256

An Evaluation on Compost Quality Produced in UTP Campus

2011· other· en· W7056448256 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUTPedia (Universiti Teknologi Petronas) · 2011
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompostGerminationFertilizerOrganic matterAmendmentWater contentOrganic fertilizerMoisture
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UTP is producing compost or organic fertilizer from the food waste that generated by cafeterias in UTP. A few tests have to be carried out to analyze the content of the compost and to determine the quality of the compost, whether it is suitable and safe to be used as fertilizer. Compost quality standard documents from Canada and United States are the main references in determining the quality of compost produced in UTP. There are 6 criteria that being considered in determining the quality of compost produced in UTP which are maturity of the compost, heavy metal content, foreign matter content, pathogens content, constituents of the compost which indicates the percent ofCHNS, NPK (Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium) content of the compost and moisture content. Maturity of compost is determined based on the germination of radish seeds and bean sprout seeds in the compost and C/N ratio of the compost. Germination of those two types of seeds is carried out in three different conditions which are in 100 % soil, 1 00 % compost and in 50 % soil and 50 % compost. The content of seven types of heavy metal which are lead, cadmium, copper, chromium, zinc, nickel and boron were tested on the compost. Any matters that are greater than 2 mm in dimension that results from human intervention and having organic or inorganic constituents such as metal, glass and synthetic polymers (plastic, rubber) are considered as foreign matters. Quanti-Tray I 2000 are the device that being used to determine the amount of bacteria in 100 ml of compost sample using IDEXX-d substrate reagent. NPK content is determined by carrying out powder pillow test. Moisture content of the compost is determined using the moisture analyzer. For maturity aspect, germination of both types of seeds only occurred in 100% soil. C/N ratio of the compost is 17.67. The content of heavy metal in the compost are within the allowable limit. For foreign matter analysis, compost produced in UTP contains no man-made foreign matter such as glass, plastic, metal and stones. For pathogens analysis, the compost does not contain E.coli. The amount ofNPK in compost produced in UTP is low compared to the standard and moisture content of the compost is 54.65 %.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.333
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUTPedia (Universiti Teknologi Petronas)Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207