MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7056451759

EVALUATING THE EFFECT OF AGE AND SEX ON UPPER LIMB KINEMATICS AMONG SASKATCHEWAN FARMERS DURING FARM TASKS.

2024· article· en· W7056451759 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWorkSafeBC
KeywordsUpper limbClimbingKinematicsTorsoScapulaHumerusUpper body
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are a significant concern for farmers, leading to disabilities and work-related injuries. Upper limb movements are related to injuries due to the nature of the farming activities. These disorders are associated with various risk factors associated with farming tasks. The upper extremities are particularly affected, with 75% of farmers in Saskatchewan reporting musculoskeletal complaints in these body parts. The purpose of this study is to better understand the typical movement strategies used by farmers without upper limb disorders and to evaluate the effect of age and sex on shoulder kinematics during high-risk farm tasks. Methods: Twenty farmers from rural Saskatchewan farms participated in the study (14 males and 6 females). The upper body motion of the participants was measured with inertial measurement unit sensors as they performed high-risk farm tasks such as climbing equipment, overhead drilling, shoveling grain/gravel, pruning, and lifting seed bags. The movement of their humeri and scapulae relative to the torso was tracked during these tasks, and scapular and humeral angles were calculated. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each task, including the mean, maximum, range, and standard deviation of the dependent variables, i.e., the scapular and humeral angles in each task. The effect of sex and age was assessed with linear regression. Results & Discussion: Some shoulder kinematic differences existed for sex and age in the studied farm tasks. On average, females had 20° higher humeral elevation ROM than the male farmers during climbing equipment. Age was positively associated with maximum humeral elevation (R2 = 0.210, P < 0.042) in the shoveling task and maximum dominant humeral external rotation (R2 = 0.294, P < 0.014) in the overhead drilling task. The axial rotation range of motion in overhead drilling was also associated with age (R2 = 0.328, P < 0.08). With advancing age, there are some upper limb kinematic changes in farmers during high-risk farm tasks. These findings contribute to the understanding of why MSDs occur in farmers. Conclusion: The study provides new knowledge about kinematic differences between the sexes and advancing age on the scapular and humeral movements during high-risk farm tasks. This study creates a control group, identifying a need for a larger dataset to create a normative dataset, for comparison, the initial step towards investigating the effects of injury on farm tasks, and the connection between farm work and injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207