MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7056481211

F2 hybrid HEAR agronomic and seed quality studies

2009· dissertation· en· W7056481211 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuality (philosophy)CultivarHabitSpring (device)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada is the world's largest producer of spring habit HEAR cultivars (McVetty et al., l99l).The currently grown HEAR cultivars, MillenniUM 03, Red River 1826 and Red River 1852 are open pollinated population cultivars.Even though there is no wholly adequate explanation to describe the phenomenon of hybrid vigor or heterosis, the seed yields of HEAR hybrids far exceed those of open pollinated population HEAR cultivars/strains.They also demonstrate greater vigor and better disease resistance.Hybrid cultivars/strains have many other advantages over open pollinated cultivars/strains such as larger seeds, enhanced oil and protein contents and superior agronomic performance.They produce bigger plants with more extensive root systems able to scavenge nutrients and moisture better.Recent studies have shown that crosses between different HEAR cultivarsistrains can result in 40 to 100 % high-parent heterosis for seed yield.For this study two different types of HEAR hybrids were used including Conventional F2 HEAR hybrids and F2 Roundup Ready HEAR hybrids.These hybrids originated from crosses of genetically and geographically distinct HEAR cultivars/lines(parents).Seven of the twelve parental lines used in this study were HEAR strains developed by the University of the Manitoba (UM) and the rest were European (EU) strains.Adequate F2 HEAR hybrid seed was produced to assess the hybrids and parents in six environments in Manitoba during 2006 and 2007.All entries in all trials had agronomic parameters assessed during the growing season including vigor, days to xt flower, days to maturity, lodging, plant height and seed yield.After harvest, six seed quality characteristics including oil concentration, protein concentration, sum of oil and protein concentration, meal protein concentration, erucic acid concentration and glucosinolate concentration were assessed in this study.Agronomic and seed quality srudies in F2 HEAR hybrids will help characterize a novel approach to using HEAR hybrid seed efficiently.Three estimates of heterosis, mid-parent, high-parent and commercial heterosis for each F2 HEAR hybrid combination were calculated.As all F2 HEAR hybrids showed higher vigor than their parents, differences between hybrids and parental strains/cultivars were easily visually distinguishable in the F2 HEAR hybrid field trials.Conventional F2 HEAR hybrids displayed high-parent heterosis estimates for seed yield of up T.o 75 o/o, mid-parent heterosis for seed yield of up to 9l Vo and commercial heterosis for seed yield of up to 56 %.Furthermore, F2 Roundup HEAR hybrids displayed high-parent heterosis estimates for seed yield of up to 76 o/0, mid-parent heterosis for seed yield of up to 97 o/o and commercial heterosis for seed yield of up to 53 %.The levels of heterosis for seed yield observed in this study were half or more of the heterosis levels observed for the corresponding Fl HEAR hybrids.The levels of heterosis observed were sufficient to warrant further study of the use of F2 HEARhybrids.In this study, F2 HEAR hybrids were much taller and had signif,rcantly better lodging resistance than their parents in all field trials.Conventional F2 HEAR hybrids displayed lower protein concentration and higher oil concentration than their parents.In contrast, F2 Roundup Ready HEAR hybrids displayed higher protein concentration and lower oil concentration.These two hybrid types were cross progeny from genetically distinct pools, so these differences were most likely genetics related.xll

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→