MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7056609472

Fine lateral and longitudinal sensor (FLLS) on-board ESA’S PROBA-3 mission

2017· article· en· W7056609472 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Portal (King's College London) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSatelliteInstrumentation (computer programming)Displacement (psychology)Position sensorRetroreflectorAerospaceBeam (structure)Position (finance)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PROBA-3 is a European Space Agency (ESA) mission to study the Sun’s corona, and is the world’s first precision formation flying mission. The mission will comprise a pair of satellites separated by 150 m, whose relative displacement must be monitored to within 300 µm in order to produce an accurate coronagraph. This measurement is provided by FLLS – the Fine Lateral and Longitudinal Sensor – being designed and built by Neptec UK and Neptec Design Group Canada. FLLS uses a retro-reflected laser beam to monitor the position of the occulter-disc satellite with respect to the coronagraph satellite. Phase measurements of the reflected beam are used to determine the longitudinal displacement between the two satellites – up to 250 m – while the motion of the returning beam on a CMOS sensor measures the lateral displacement. This system is being designed in collaboration with Surrey Space Centre, and presents exciting challenges in performance testing and ground-based calibration over its full operating range. The completed FLLS system will be suitable for any type of mission requiring accurate displacement measurements. This could be between a constellation of satellites observing the Earth, or within a science mission monitoring instrumentation positions. FLLS could allow large-scale structures to be deployed and maintained in space, monitoring structural distortion before, during, and after deployment, and providing in-flight corrections to data collection. Examples of such future applications include in-orbit observatories, positioning of telecommunication satellite antennas, and deployable mechanisms on lunar or Martian missions. The paper and anticipated presentation will provide a comprehensive overview of FLLS including technical designs, calibration and performance test plans, as well as the envisaged scope for future applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Portal (King's College London)Same topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207