MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7056688910

Hábitos alimentares de criança do 1º Ciclo do Ensino Básico - um estudo de caso

2005· dissertation· pt· W7056688910 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho) · 2005
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeelingContext (archaeology)Set (abstract data type)Class (philosophy)Field (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Health is understood as being an everyday resource and not as an end to life itself.It is not an exclusive responsibility of the health sector, yet it requires a healthy lifestyle so as to ensure well-being, and nutrition is both a necessary condition and a fundamental resource for health (The Ottawa Chart, 1986).With the passing of time and changes in lifestyles, people have acquired new eating and consumerism habits, thus greatly affecting Public Health.It is due to these changes that a serious health problem is beginning to be perceived, which the world is currently facing up to.Consequently, getting to know the eating habits of populations is a matter of utmost importance so as to evaluate situations and to act upon these in the case of serious eating errors.This study aims to obtain information regarding the eating habits of the primary school population (1 st Cycle -the first four years of education) in the area of Montalegre.Thus, two identical questionnaires were set up, one for the children and another for their respective parents / tutors.The questions essentially aimed at obtaining information concerning the frequency of meals and their nutritional balance.The questionnaires were answered by 72 children and 67 parents / tutors.The results reveal that only 14% of the children and 41% of the parents / tutors state that the children have five daily meals.Most of the children (65%) and some of the parents / tutors stated that the children have four daily meals.With regard to the nutritional balance of meals, both children and parents / tutors mention recommended foods as being those which are eaten most by the children in their various daily meals.However, all the people concerned also referred to (though in reduced percentages) foods which are not recommended for child nutrition.Examples of these are "bolicaus" (chocolate buns), cakes, chocolates, crisps, hamburgers and pizzas; concerning drinks, coca-cola is excessively drunk and some even mention drinking wine.This aspect may constitute a starting point in health promotion activities -as is suggested in the last part of the study -involving the entire education community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0880.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207