FIFTY YEARS AFTER THE DECLARATION: THE UNITED NATIONS' RECORD ON HUMAN RIGHTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Preface: a first step / Teresa Wagner -- The United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights -- Introduction: Fifty years of the U.N. Declaration on Human Rights / Habib Malik (Lebanon) -- Ch. 1. Religious freedom and the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights / Paul Marshall (Canada) -- Ch. 2. The paramount human right: the right to life / David Alton (Great Britain) -- Ch. 3. Euthanasia and the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights / Karel Gunning (Netherlands) -- Ch. 4. The right to health according to WHO / Isabel Bilmore (Belgium) -- Ch. 5. Is cloning compatible with human rights and human dignity? / Henk Jochemsen (Netherlands) -- Ch. 6. The role of the United Nations in international drug control / Irving G. Tragen (United States) -- Ch. 7. Drug legalization and the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights / Franziska Haller (Switzerland) -- Ch. 8. China's Laogal: a gross human rights violation / Harry Wu (China) -- Ch. 9. Parental rights are fundamental human rights / Elisabeth Gusdek-Petersen (Switzerland) -- Ch. 10. The wrongs of the United Nations' Rights of the Child / Charles Francis (Australia) -- Ch. 11. Publicly funded schools: the United Nations' captive audience / Nick Seaton (Great Britain) -- Ch. 12. The International Criminal Court, human rights and the family / Richard Wilkins and Kathryn Balmforth (United States) -- Ch. 13. Human rights and the gender perspective / Dale O'Leary (United States) -- Ch. 14. Homosexuality is not a universal human right / Tom McFeely (Canada) -- Ch. 15. Population control efforts: a gross abuse of human rights / David Morrison (United States) -- Ch. 16. The United Nations, feminism and day care / Babette Francis (Australia) -- Ch. 17. Human rights and U.S. military interventions / Karl Farris (United States) -- Ch. 18. Reflections of an ambassador / Alan Keyes (United States)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.422 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".