MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7056835716

A genome-wide association study of the three complement system activation pathways implicates causal biological and pathological mechanisms

2023· other· en· W7056835716 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueView · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillNational Cancer InstituteVanderbilt University Medical CenterPerelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterChinese University of Hong KongUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillCurtin University of TechnologyUniversity of WashingtonCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUniversity of MiamiMorehouse School of MedicineSchool of Medicine, Case Western Reserve UniversityUniversity of Texas at El PasoSchool of Medicine, Indiana UniversityPennsylvania State UniversityVanderbilt UniversityLeonard M. Miller School of MedicineUniversity of TorontoCase Western Reserve UniversityShenzhen Research Institute, City University of Hong KongMichigan State UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaCommonwealth of KentuckyRush UniversityWayne State University
KeywordsComplement systemComplement (music)Complement receptorInnate immune systemClassical complement pathwayImmune systemAssociation (psychology)Alternative complement pathwayLectin pathway
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alterations of the complement system (CS), which is a fundamental part of the innate immune response, are associated with both rare and common human diseases. The CS is activated via three distinct pathways: classical (CP), mannose-binding lectin (LP), and alternative (AP) pathways. No hypothesis-free genome-wide screen of the three CS pathways has been conducted so far. We conducted genome-wide

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueViewSame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207