A Historical Account of the Orderly Payment of Debts Act Reference: Limiting Provincial Efforts to Protect Insolvent Debtors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper analyzes the history of the Alberta Orderly Payment of Debts Act and the constitutional controversy that followed. The legislation sought to protect debtors by imposing restrictions on creditors. In 1960, the Supreme Court of Canada in Reference re Validity of Orderly Payment of Debts Act, 1959 (Alberta) ruled that the legislation was ultra vires on the basis that it interfered with the federal bankruptcy and insolvency power. The Orderly Payment of Debts Act reference is the capstone in a trilogy of cases in which provincial legislation was invalidated for encroaching upon the federal bankruptcy and insolvency power. The reference case represents a high-water mark for the expansion of the federal bankruptcy power and a curtailment of provincial authority to assist insolvent debtors. The paper argues that the OPDA reference is a landmark case in that it continued a trend of limiting provincial efforts to assist insolvent debtors by giving a broad reading of the federal bankruptcy and insolvency power.\nCet article analyse l’historique de la Alberta Orderly Payment of Debts Act (Loi albertaine sur le paiement ordonné des dettes) et la controverse constitutionnelle qui s’en est suivie. Cette loi visait à protéger les débiteurs en imposant des restrictions aux créanciers. En 1960, la Cour suprême du Canada, dans l’affaire Reference re Validity of Orderly Payment of Debts Act, 1959 (Alberta), a jugé que la loi était ultra vires au motif qu’elle interférait avec le pouvoir fédéral en matière de faillite et d’insolvabilité. La référence à l’Orderly Payment of Debts Act est la pierre angulaire d’une trilogie d’affaires dans lesquelles la législation provinciale a été invalidée pour avoir empiété sur le pouvoir fédéral en matière de faillite et d’insolvabilité. L’affaire représente un point culminant pour l’expansion du pouvoir fédéral en matière de faillite et une réduction de l’autorité provinciale pour aider les débiteurs insolvables. L’article soutient que l’arrêt OPDA est un arrêt de principe dans la mesure où il a poursuivi la tendance à limiter les efforts des provinces pour aider les débiteurs insolvables en donnant une interprétation large du pouvoir fédéral en matière de faillite et d’insolvabilité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".