How Self-Employed Women with Children Manage Multiple Life Roles / Illustration de la façon dont les mères travailleuses autonomes gèrent plusieurs rôles de vie
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract \n \nAlthough there is a strong body of existing research on women’s career-life development and on women’s entrepreneurship, there is a lack of understanding of the specific experiences of mother entrepreneurs. This grounded theory study addresses the question of how self-employed women with children manage their multiple life roles. The core category “Keeping Going” illustrates a basic social process that is recursively fuelled and affected by 7 key properties: feeling supported, making choices, adapting creatively, remembering the push, remembering the pull, envisioning the future, and living my values. Implications for further research and counselling practice are discussed. \n \nRésumé \n \nMalgré qu’il existe de nombreuses études sur le développement de carrière chez les femmes et sur l’entrepreneuriat au féminin, il subsiste des lacunes dans la compréhension des expériences spécifiques aux mères entrepreneures. Cette étude théorique à base empirique aborde la question de la gestion des multiples rôles de vie chez les mères travailleuses auto- nomes. La catégorie de base « Keeping Going » (poursuivre sans relâche) illustre la démarche sociale fondamentale qui est \nalimentée et touchée de façon récursive par 7 propriétés clés : se sentir appuyée, faire des choix, s’adapter de manière créative, se rappeler la poussée, se rappeler la traction, imaginer l’avenir et vivre ses valeurs. L’article présente une discussion des implications pour de plus amples recherches et pour la pratique du counseling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it