HUBUNGAN RELIGIUSITAS DAN DUKUNGAN SOSIAL DENGAN QUARTER LIFE CRISIS PADA SANTRI MAHASISWA PONDOK PESANTREN WAHID HASYIM YOGYAKARTA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to determine the relationship between religiosity and social support with quarter life crisis in students of Wahid Hasyim Islamic Boarding School Yogyakarta. The participating subjects were 83 student students at the Wahid Hasyim Islamic Boarding School Yogyakarta. The scales used are the modified Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) and Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE), the scale of religiosity, and The Multidimensional Scale of Preceived Social Support (MSPSS). The research method is quantitative correlational with multiple regression analysis. The results showed that the major hypothesis was accepted. There is a significant negative relationship between religiosity and social support with quarter life crisis in students of Wahid Hasyim Islamic Boarding School Yogyakarta with a result of F = 88.153 and significant 0.000. The results of the partial test of religiosity showed no relationship between religiosity and quarter life crisis in students of the Wahid Hasyim Islamic Boarding School Yogyakarta as much as 3.818 and a significance value of 0.00 (p < 0.05) which means that the first minor hypothesis was rejected. Furthermore, the partial test of social support showed that there was a significant negative relationship between social support and quarter life crisis in students of Wahid Hasyim Islamic Boarding School Yogyakarta as much as -12,406 and a significance value of 0.00 (p < 0.05) which means that the second minuor hypothesis is accepted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".