MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7057107794

Identification of novel genes and mechanisms responsible for recurrent pregnancy loss

2024· dissertation· en· W7057107794 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftMcGill University Health CentreMitacsMcGill University
KeywordsIdentification (biology)GenePregnancyDiseaseMutationPopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Approximately 1020% of clinically recognized pregnancies result in spontaneous loss.The occurrence of at least two of such events before 24 weeks of gestation is termed recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), which affects 15% of couples trying to conceive, and approximately half of these cases remain clinically unexplained.Exome sequencing on patients with RPL revealed a homozygous nonsense mutation in HORMAD2 in a patient with eight recurrent miscarriages and no live birth.HORMAD2 is an essential protein of the synaptonemal complex.Microscopic morphological evaluation of one of the patient's miscarriages confirmed its diagnosis.Microsatellite genotyping on available DNA from two other miscarriages demonstrated that they are triploid digynic and resulted from the failure of maternal Meiosis II (MII).Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray analysis revealed an additional Meiosis I (MI) abnormality that is the segregation of the two maternal homologous chromosomes 16 and 19 in one conception.My data will improve current understanding of the genetic causes and mechanisms underlying RPL, which will guide clinical management of such conditions and improve women's health.I am truly grateful for all the help and kindness I have received throughout my studies.I would like to begin by expressing my gratitude to the most important person for my MSc project, my supervisor Dr. Rima Slim.Thank you for all your trust in me, especially when I am stressed about my project.Without your guidance and support I would not have the courage to peruse a PhD.Thank you for opening your door to me and providing help every time I knocked, and for giving me the opportunity to attend the workshop at The Jackson Laboratory.I would like to extend my thanks to Dr. Teruko Taketo for training me in oocyte experiments.I cannot thank you enough for being so patient and for tolerating my mistakes.What I learned from both of you are incredibly valuable for my future studies

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→