MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7057131291

Identification of novel regulatory mechanisms for for Cdc42 GTPase-activating protein CdGAP/ARHGAP31, a protein involved in development and cancer

2017· dissertation· en· W7057131291 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMcGill University Health CentreFaculty of Medicine, McGill UniversityMcGill University
KeywordsGuanine nucleotide exchange factorCDC42GTPase-activating proteinRAC1RegulatorGTPaseEndocytic cyclePhosphorylationRac GTP-Binding Proteins
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The small Rho GTPase proteins act as molecular switches that regulate diverse cellular processes linked mostly to the actin-cytoskeleton remodeling making them essential regulators of cell adhesion, migration and invasion. Dysregulation of their activities can result in different abnormal phenotypes particularly, tumor progression and metastasis. Hence, regulators of Rho GTPases such as Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factors (RhoGEFs) and Rho GTPase-activating proteins (RhoGAPs), are critical for normal cellular responses and are targets for subversion during oncogenic transformation. CdGAP (Cdc42 GTPase-activating protein) is a member of a well-conserved subfamily of RhoGAP proteins and a negative regulator of the small Rho GTPases, Rac1 and Cdc42. Associated with a rare developmental disorder (AOS, Adams-Oliver Syndrome) and required for a normal angiogenesis, CdGAP plays important roles in the regulation of cell migration and proliferation during early development. In addition, recent findings characterize CdGAP as an essential synergistic component between TGFβ and HER2/Neu/ErbB-2 signaling pathways which play a positive role in cancer, particularly breast cancer. CdGAP is regulated by lipid binding, protein-protein interactions and phosphorylation, still these mechanisms are not well understood. In this work we first investigate the interaction between CdGAP and its negative regulator, the endocytic protein Intersectin. Using an in vitro approach, we identify a novel, atypical xKx(K/R) (SKSKK) motif in the basic rich (BR) region of CdGAP that directly interacts with the Intersectin-SH3D domain. Moreover, the well-conserved motif is required for the regulation of CdGAP activity following Intersectin binding. Next, we investigate CdGAP phosphorylation and identify two regulatory phospho-serines in the C-terminal (CT) tail, Ser-1093 and Ser-1163, that are phosphorylated by the AGC-kinase family member, RSK1. Finally, we show that 14-3-3 family members bind and regulate both the cellular localization and activity of CdGAP in a Ser-1093 and Ser-1163 phosphorylation-dependent manner. Overall, this work provides two novel CdGAP-regulatory mechanisms that can be applied in therapeutic approaches targeting this RhoGAP, particularly in breast cancers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→