Bibliographic record
Abstract
There were numerous developments for international environmental law and policy in 2002.This article briefly discusses some of the more noteworthy.This year, in keeping with the effort to streamline the year-in-review overall, the International Environmental Law Committee has taken this more focused approach, rather than attempt a more comprehensive reporting effort.In light of this new approach, a list of web links is provided at the end of the article to facilitate efforts to find out more about developments with respect both to the instruments and fora discussed in this article and those not addressed this year. I. World Summit on Sustainable DevelopmentThe World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) occurred in the late summer of 2002 in Johannesburg, South Africa.'The WSSD marked the 10th anniversary of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED or Earth Summit) held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in 1992.By resolution in December 2000, the United Nations General Assembly authorized the WSSD, as a ten-year review of UNCED at the summit level, to reinvigorate the global commitment to sustainable development. 2 In accordance with the resolution, the WSSD addressed areas requiring further efforts to *Any views or opinions expressed in this text are those of the authors in their personal capacities, and do not necessarily represent the views of the organizations for which they work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.235 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".