MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7057242063

Indigenous Wholistic Abolition: Visioning Indigenous Queer, Two-Spirit & Indigiqueer Futures

2024· article· en· W7057242063 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrostatic Discharge in Electronics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousVisionCeremonyTransformative learningFutures contractTraditional knowledgeQueerEthnography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a queer Métis, activist and organizer in the field of prisoners’ rights, penal abolition, and transformative justice, I have been interested in learning about how Indigenous peoples’ relationship with Aki (Land) grounds abolition theory and guides the ways that I and other Indigenous abolitionists engage in abolition. As part of this process, I wanted to speak to other Indigenous queer, Two-Spirit, trans, non-binary, and/or Indigiqueer (Q2STNBI) people about their visions of abolition and abolitionist futures through a relational Land-based lens. Therefore, I used a methodology that centres Métis worldviews and community organizing and is grounded in the ethics of relational accountability, relevance, respect, reciprocity, and responsibility. Métis methodologies and worldviews include visiting, Circle Work, food sharing, kinship, and Land. For my search, I spoke with 10 Q2STNBI friends, kin, and colleagues who had each had at least three years of experience in abolition organizing at the time of our conversations. I also had four conversations with Aki near Grand Valley Prison for Women, on the traditional territory of the Neutral, Anishinaabe and Haudenosaunee peoples (also known as Kitchener–Waterloo, Ontario). Throughout this process, I have considered myself to be a participant-researcher because of my longstanding work as an abolitionist organizer and because I was actively engaged in all conversations.\nMy meaning-making process involved ceremony and more time with Aki, which deepened my relationship with myself, my friends, kin, and colleagues, and my re-search.[1] I used a Land-based lens throughout my dissertation which included a wholistic framework: Spirit, relationship, knowledge, and action. The findings of my search included abolitionist themes that are grounded in the Spirit of Aki, which includes: Indigenous knowledges, belonging to Aki, and Aki as Teacher. In the Relationship quadrant, themes of Natural Laws, Our Bodies as Land, and relationships with humans/Creation emerged. A broader definition of abolition and transformative justice started to develop within the Knowledge quadrant and finally, movements on climate justice and Land Back emerged within the Action/Doing quadrant. All of these together represent an emerging Indigenous Wholistic Abolition, which is grounded in our relationship with Creation. Indigenous Wholistic Abolition honours the foundation and principles of Indigenous knowledges, grounding Indigenous identities, love of Aki, space and place, biidaaban, Aki as teacher, Aki as healing, body and land sovereignty, sovereign erotic, consent, Indigiqueer anti-carceral feminism and Land Back as an Indigenous queer, two-spirit, Indigiqueer movement.\nIn the end, this dissertation is a series of love letters. It expresses the Spirit in which I engaged in abolition work for the past 30 years. It also reflects my relationships with activists working on abolition and the collective knowledge we have built. Finally, I want to honour the love I have for people dreaming and engaging in Indigenous Q2STNBI abolitionist futures.\n[1] I used the language of ‘re-search’ and ‘search’ based on the work of Dr. Kathy Absolon (2022). She explains that Indigenous re-search is about ‘looking again’ at how re-search restores Indigeneity and Indigenous epistemologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it