A imprensa salmantina nos inícios de quinhentos: a edição da obra humanista de Aires Barbosa, o Mestre Grego \n
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Known by the famous epithet of Greek Master, for having been the first to teach the language \nof Homer in a university in the Iberian Peninsula, the Portuguese humanist Aires Barbosa (ca. 1470-1540) \nstands out as a teacher of Latin and Greek at the University of Salamanca in the first quarter of the \nsixteenth century. Between 1511 and 1517, alongside his teaching activities, he published four booklets in \nLatin designed to clarify his disciples about the subjects he taught, a collection of epigrams and an \nextensive volume entitled Commentary of Arator's “Historia apostolica” (1516), the embodiment of the \nlessons given by Barbosa in the regency of the chair of Grammar, and which constitutes his masterpiece. \nThe original edition of this works present several reasons of interest and no less difficulties for those who \nventure to read and transcribe the barbosian text, and reflect the advances and limitations of the Press in \nthe city of Tormes in the early sixteenth century. The aim of this paper is to describe and explain several \naspects that stand out in the reading of the original text, such as excessive compression of the text and \nthe lack of illustrations, even when they were initially planned; the existence of errors assignable to either \nthe author or to the carelessness of the printer; the constant use of abbreviations, some of them not filed \nin dictionaries by the experts; or the transcription of words and texts in Hellenic language into Latin \ncharacters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".