"I Feel At Peace". A Standpoint Feminist Perspective of Canadian Muslim Women Studying the Qur'an
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Well-being encompasses physical, mental and social aspects of life. For Canadian Muslim women, the intersection of their identity, faith and contextual factors all shapes their well-being, now more than ever at a time when we see an increase in gendered Islamophobia. Rationale: The intersection between historical views of womanhood, modern feminist ideals and faith, especially within gender-traditional religious groups lacks critical qualitative methodologies and often includes Eurocentric perceptions of what it might mean to be a “minority” woman. The aim of this doctoral work was to better understand how Canadian Muslim women utilize their faith, grounded in the Qurʼān and Prophetic Tradition, to cope with mental health stressors, navigate their Canadian identity, as well as explore their understanding of empowerment. Methods: We conducted 38 in-depth, virtual interviews with Muslim women formally studying the Quran at Al Huda Institute. Along with the interviews, we asked participants to bring an artifact that represents their journey of becoming a student of knowledge. Data were analyzed using constructivist grounded theory and arts-informed approaches, revealing three categories: Qurʼān and Spirituality, Qurʼān and Well-being, and Qurʼān and Identity. Results: Religious identity played a crucial role in Muslim women's wellness because it provided spiritual strength, resilience and meaning to life, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings also indicated the importance of religious learning institutes for Muslim women as third spaces, serving as sources of peer support for women of faith. Discussion: The study findings call for a new perspective that acknowledges Qurʼānic knowledge as an empowering force to improve Muslim women’s identity and well-being, while challenging widespread Orientalist as well as Western feminist ideas which tend to marginalize Muslim women within Canadian social structures. The proposed Holistic Qurʼānic Empowerment Model supports culturally specific holistic religious education approaches which exemplifies the diverse contexts and experiences of Muslim women who self-define well-being, identity and empowerment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.048 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".