The International Rule of Law in a Human Rights Era
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Law and Lund University Faculty of Law.Participants hailed from a wide range of judicial institutions, including those that address the violation of human rights by States in Africa, the Americas and Europe, as well as those that resolve disputes among States at the global and regional levels.Other participants represented institutions that investigate and try individuals accused of international crimes, from the International Criminal Court to tribunals focused on crimes committed in Cambodia, Lebanon, Rwanda, Sierra Leone and the former Yugoslavia.Sessions were held over four days around the overarching theme "The International Rule of Law in a Human Rights Era."This theme was chosen because of the growing influence of human rights on legal thinking and practice, as well as on the work of international judges and their institutions.The first session of the Institute, led by Judge Hisashi Owada (Japan) of the International Court of Justice and Judge Fausto Pocar (Italy) of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, set the stage with an exploration of the expanding impact of human rights on international courts and tribunals.Participants went on to examine a number of critical subjects in contemporary global justice through a wide-ranging set of sessions.These included: the role played by State engagement and diplomacy, led by Ambassador
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".