MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7057626137

Larroque Art Festival 2019

2019· other· es· W7057626137 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueVeřejné služby Informačního systému (Masarykiana Brunensis Universitas) · 2019
Typeother
Languagees
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStudioPaintingTheme (computing)Art worldGeneral partnershipExhibition
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Saytour, and Viallat, from the South of France), who in the 1960s were trying to find a way to continue to make painting in the aftermath of the May 1968 events.The questions they asked about what kind of painting was possible and relevant in the contemporary world are still with us and some of the artists included in the show are still working through possible answers.This year, in partnership with our fellow artist-led initiative, the Lacuna Studios in Lanzarote, Spain, we have had entries from as far afield as Angola and Brasil, Canada and Korea -93 artists from 30 countries in Larroque and about 150 artists from 50 countries in Lanzarote.What I was not expecting, at least when the images started to arrive from all over the world, was the number of artists and images that interpreted the theme by reflecting on the pollution of the ocean and the surface of the planet.The surface of the skin also appears in a few artist's works: close up and under the microscope.It is true that the skin is our biggest organ, and if it is badly damaged the other organs cannot survive.It is also our interface with the world: the way we feel it, sense it, touch it.And if the surface of the world is severely damaged, how are we going to feed ourselves, and make our homes here?It is of course, not surprising that artists respond deeply to this crisis-they are our antennae, sensing and finding ways to articulate the impending disaster, and mobilise against its inevitability.Images of the Amazonian rainforest, 'the lungs of the world', currently more under threat than ever by the current reversing of deforestation regulations, appear in several works.It is said that every fifth breath we take is produced by the Amazonian rain forest.As it diminishes daily, so too does our breath.Images of the sea, the beach, shipping, borders and exploration -from Ulysses voyage to Mars probesalso reflect concerns about migration, rootlessness, the destruction of safe habitat and the political mismanagement which seems to be a feature of the global present.Some work reflects on or utilises science as a positive option, offering hope of resolutions or as an inspiration for engendering creative new collaborations."Instructions for Use" uses photographs of old machine parts and factory instructions from a disused factory, combined with hand drawn animation and an electronic soundtrack by Irish composer Bernard O'Neill to evoke the futuristic dream of technology from the 1950's and '60s.The surfaces of cracked paintwork are reanimated in the process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4650.106

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it