L’engagement citoyen des jeunes en mutation : retour sur une expérience de mobilisation et transfert des connaissances en collaboration avec le secrétariat à la jeunesse du Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet essai relate mon expérience de stage en mobilisation et transfert des connaissances, menée en collaboration avec la Chaire-Réseau de recherche sur la jeunesse du Québec (CRJ) en tant que milieu de recherche, et le Secrétariat à la jeunesse du Québec (SAJ) en tant que milieu de pratique.L'objectif principal de ce stage était d'enrichir les connaissances du SAJ sur l'engagement citoyen des jeunes. Cette finalité a été atteinte de deux manières distinctes : premièrement, à travers mon projet de recherche portant sur la désobéissance civile de jeunes engagé·e·s au sein du récent mouvement climatique, et deuxièmement, grâce à ma contribution au forum franco-québécois sur la jeunesse intitulé Comment les jeunes réinventent-ils l'engagement citoyen? Bien plus qu'une simple description, le présent essai constitue un espace réflexif visant à apporter un regard critique sur la notion de mobilisation et le transfert des connaissances, ainsi que sur le rôle de la recherche en contexte d'action publique envers la jeunesse. \n \nThis essay recounts my experience of a mobilization and knowledge transfer internship, conducted in collaboration with The Youth Network Chair (Chaire-réseau Jeunesse du Québec or CRJ) as the research environment and the Quebec’s Youth Secretariat (Secrétariat à la jeunesse du Québec or SAJ) as the research partner. The primary objective of this internship was to enhance SAJ's understanding of youth civic engagement. This goal was achieved in two distinct ways : firstly, through my research project focusing on the civil disobedience of young people involved in the recent climate movement, and secondly, through my contribution to the France-Quebec youth forum titled Comment les jeunes réinventent-ils l'engagement citoyen? Beyond a mere description, this essay serves as a reflective space aimed at providing a critical perspective on the concept of knowledge mobilization and knowledge transfer, as well as the role of research in a context of public action toward youth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.040 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".