L'intercaf du printemps de l'an 2000 : rendez-vous au cSur du quartier latin /
Bibliographic record
Abstract
endredi 24 mars, 9h30, coin Ontario et Sanguinet.Le centre d'aide en français du 255, rue Ontario Est s'anime peu à peu de 39 voix de 26 origines différentes, voix abitibiennes, saint-féliciennes ou tout bonnement locales.Café en main, les gens se retrouvent ou font connaissance.De toute évidence, le rendez-vous semestriel lancé par le CCDMD[1] aux responsables de cafs en est un à ne pas manquer !Certaines personnes pro tent de l'occasion pour visiter les lieux, poser des questions sur le caf du collège hôte, soit le cégep du Vieux Montréal. Vue sur la nouvelle grammairePendant près de deux heures, en ce vendredi matin de printemps, les responsables de caf écoutent la responsable du programme de français du CCDMD, Huguette Maisonneuve, présenter ce qu'il est convenu d'appeler « la nouvelle grammaire ».Celle-ci a fait son entrée au secondaire, et les élèves qui sont cette année en première ou en deuxième secondaires en apprennent les rudiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".