MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7057852366

Long-term eddy covariance fluxes and xylem anatomy for understanding carbon fixation in white pine woody biomass

2022· article· en· W7057852366 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Padua Archive (University of Padua) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXylemEddy covarianceBiomass (ecology)Growing seasonDendrochronologyCarbon fibersWoody plantTracheidClimate change
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Improving our understanding of the carbon cycle is key to addressing the challenges of climate change. In this study, we investigated the relationships between intra and inter-annual climate variations, carbon fluxes, and the xylem biomass in an 80-year plantation of Pinus strobus at Turkey Point, Ontario, Canada. From eddy covariance tower, we obtained daily Gross Primary Production (GPP), precipitation and air temperature for the period 2003-2018. To determine inter-and intra-annual xylem biomass we selected 12 trees and built wood anatomical trait chronologies (cell lumen area, cell wall thickness, cell number, cell wall area and ring wall area) over the past 50 years. Using moving windows, we correlated all chronologies with daily climate data and GPP to analyse their associations at intra-annual scale.
\nThe analysis showed that cell lumen area and cell wall thickness were strongly influenced by spring and summer temperature and precipitation. For the first time, we observed strong positive and significant correlations between GPP in the growing season and the cell wall area (which estimates the amount of carbon in each xylem cell) both in earlywood (May 10 - Aug 4, r = 0.685) and latewood (Jul 3 – Sep 3, r = 0.885). Strong positive correlations were also found between GPP and cell number and ring wall area. These results suggest a direct linkage between CO2 fluxes and the accumulation of carbon in woody biomass. This work will help to reconcile two important techniques that are widely used to study carbon sequestration in forests. It will help to reduce uncertainty in woody carbon accumulation and will open new perspectives in the study of the forest carbon cycle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Padua Archive (University of Padua)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207