"Le declinazioni dell'io":l'influenza del multilinguismo sull'individualita in The Book of Negroes di Lawrence Hill.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il presente lavoro analizza come il linguaggio e le lingue, temi centrali per la produzione letteraria post coloniale, possano influire sulla costruzione della personalità di un individuo. Il primo capitolo presenta il panorama letterario canadese dalle origini a oggi e si vedrà come l'autore, Lawrence Hill, e l'opera presa in analisi, The Book of Negroes, si inseriscono all'interno di questo panorama. Il secondo capitolo contiene la traduzione con testo originale a fronte, di una parte del romanzo con una breve analisi delle difficoltà traduttive. La terza analizza come la Bildung della protagonista,sia segnata dall'apprendimento di nuove lingue. A partire da Hegel fino a Gayatri Spivak, Édouard Glissant, Franz Fanon, si analizzerà l'influenza del multilinguismo sull'individialità, quanto i diversi livelli di competenza linguistica influiscano l'identità di un individuo, la percezione che lo stesso ha di sé e quella che terzi hanno di lui e, infine, quanto sia importante, per coloro che vengono chiamati "subalterni", avere una propria voce per poter raccontare la Storia dal loro punto di vista. This work analyses how language and tongues, major themes for the postcolonial literature, have an influence on one character's Bildung. The first chapter presents a panorama of the Canadian literature from the origins until today and how the author, Lawrence Hill, and his work, The Book of Negroes, are part of this panorama. The second chapter consists in a translation of part of the novel and a little analysis of the translation problems. The third part analyses how the Bildung of the major character is influenced by learning new languages. From Hegel to Gayatri Spivak, Édouard Glissant, Franz Fanon, the last chapter analyses the influence of multilingualism on the individuality, how the different levels of linguistic competence affect ones identity, the sense of self that one has, and how the others see him. Last but not least, the importance for the "subalterns" to have their own voice in order to tell the History from their point of view.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".