MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7058309269

Mathematical Modeling of Phytoplankton in Lake Ontario,Part 2 Simulations Using Lake 1 Model

2005· report· en· W7058309269 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary, Museums and Press - UDSpace (University of Delaware) · 2005
Typereport
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
KeywordsEpilimnionPhytoplanktonTerm (time)ExclosureForcing (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The results of a series of simulations of the response of the open lake region of Lake Ontario to various levels of nutrient input are described in this report. The simulations use a simplified dynamic model of phytoplankton nutrient interactions in a vertically segmented structure. \nThe lake is assumed to be well-mixed in the horizontal direction. The problem of long term simulations (10-20 years) that draw on short term observation and verification periods (5 years) is discussed and it is indicated that the overall \nloss rates of nutrient are of particular importance. Under a hypothesized, but reasonable, set of model parameters, the simulations indicate that the present observed open lake phytoplankton biomass of Lake Ontario does not appear to be in equilibrium with the present input nutrient load. \nTherefore, if the present load is continued, it is estimated that spring peak phytoplankton chlorophyll in the epilimnion will continue to increase to a new level about 45% higher \nthan present levels. The interaction of nitrogen and phosphorus is also described by the simulations and the results indicate a tendency for nitrogen limitation to be an increasing dominant factor in controlling the spring \nbloom. \nA pastoral" simulation using load estimates, indicative of conditions prior to man's intensive activity provides an approximation of an early state of the lake. This "hindcast" indicates that spring phytoplankton levels were some 40% less than present levels and average \nannual epilimnion biomass under equilibrium with present loads is about twice that under pastoral conditions. A series of analyses is also conducted comparing simulations \nfrom the dynamic model to estimates made from simplified plots of loading versus lake geometry. The results from the dynamic model indicate that a reduction in external nutrient load does not result in an accompanying decrease in \nphytoplankton biomass, due to the hypothesized non-equilibrium condition of Lake Ontario. The dynamic model results are therefore in contrast to the results one would obtain from \nusing "admissable" loading concept which indicates an improvement in lake trophic status. \nAnalysis of lake response to the U.S.-Canada Water Quality Agreement (WQA) loads using the hypothesized parameters indicates about a 6% reduction in peak phytoplankton at \nequilibrium. The implications of the results appear to be of some importance since the analyses indicate that it may difficult to achieve measurable reductions below present \nlevels of phytoplankton biomass in the open lake. From a decision and policy making viewpoint then, the simulations tend to indicate that maximum point source nutrient control for Lake Ontario will, at best, be a "ho1ding" action rather than a significant improvement in the status of the \nbe open lake. This report was submitted in partial fulfillment of Grant Number R 800610 to the Environmental Engineering and Science Program, Manhattan College, Bronx, New York \nby the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Work was completed as of April, 1975.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score0.746

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary, Museums and Press - UDSpace (University of Delaware)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207