Bibliographic record
Abstract
Made as a response to the events of 9/11, Flight is a 15 minute film that celebrates and questions our relationship with flying. The film explores the idea of flight through an examination of the psychological state of mind and the necessary suspension of\n\nreality it induces in the passenger. It is set in the socio-political context of the crisis of airline flight. Structured around an\n\nimaginary plane journey Flight links the experiential processes of flying with the distancing process of psychoanalysis and the\n\nfragmentary nature of modern identity. Flight provides a new parallel between the production of meaning in cinema, the\n\noperation of the unconscious mind and the development of the self as defined by psychoanalysis.\n\nFlight consists of new material culled from 30 hours of video footage shot at Los Angeles airport where the artist was located for\n\na month. It also contains extracts of image and sound archive material from many fiction and documentary sources. The\n\ntheoretical grounding which informs the distilling of autobiographical, fictional and documentary forms in Flight resulted in\n\nMaziere’s recent writings and commissioning on subjectivity and cinema in a special issue of Art In Sight: The Dispersed\n\nSubject, Art in Sight, Issue 33, Spring 2007 (guest editor and contributor).\n\nResearched and developed during a 3 month artists’ residency on the theme of Time at BANFF, Canada. The film was exhibited\n\nat Worldwide Video Festival, Amsterdam, by invitation from the curators alongside works by Andy Warhol, Stan Douglas and\n\nPierre Huyghe. It was further exhibited at international venues including Media Arts Festival, Germany, and Melbourne\n\nInternational Film Festival. The film has been used by ACE as a model of good practice in the context of their International\n\nFellowship programme, exhibited at the Fellowship launch at Sketch Gallery, London, and covered in the catalogue Freefall.\n\nCitations include Elwes (2005); Curtis (2007).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".