MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7061170199

Odbory spolku „Čech“ a „Československého národního domu T. G. Masaryka v Sofii“ v letech 1919–1939

2020· article· en· W7061170199 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCzechClubAssociation (psychology)Mutual aidElement (criminal law)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Czech community in Sofia created complex associations, which became part of its daily life. The main compatriot association was the club “Czech”, established in 1892. It was later succeeded by the “Czechoslovak national house of T. G. Masaryk in Sofia” in 1925. Those big associations were organizing many events and anniversaries, connected with the Czech nation. They also had the very important role of keeping the community unified. Starting as an autonomous association, some of the later divisions of the compatriot club give us important information about what the Czechs thought they were missing in their compatriot society. It was the association of the Czech girls and women, later known as “České srdce” that was the most long-lived among all of them (from 1919 to 1939). It successfully filled not only the role of woman organization, but also as a charitable organization. As such it was very important for ensuing the well-being of all the misfortunate members of the community which fell into poverty. It was also the only division that was reestablished after the Second World War. The economic crisis of the 30s led to the creation of another charitable division of the “Czechoslovakian national house” — the “Baračníci”. It existed only for six years, from 1932 to 1938. Although relatively short lived, this division was mainly oriented into helping poor children from the Czech school in Sofia. As such it also represents the will of the compatriot community to help its members. This will be represented also by the mutual insurance association “Vzájemnost”, which was established in 1921. In 1925 it became the insurance division of the “Czechoslovak national house”. The original idea of insuring the members of the community in the case of death soon became limited by the administrative overload and the issue of sustainability with the declining number of insured people. The primary target to insure all members of the compatriot community was never reached and the division soon fell into a decline and was dissolved after 1934. All those divisions provide us an interesting view of the compatriot community in Sofia. The one resemblance between them was the idea of solidarity within the community which ensured that its members remained unified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.228
GPT teacher head0.530
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→