MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7061290147

Quality of asthma treatment in children and adolescents (QUAST-CA)

2022· dissertation· en· W7061290147 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsthmaMedical prescriptionLogistic regressionExacerbationOdds ratioCohortRetrospective cohort studyCohort study
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asthma is a chronic heterogeneous condition of the airway and is prevalent in large number of Canadian children and adolescents. Despite the existence of evidence-based treatment guidelines, the management of asthma remains suboptimal, and many patients continue to experience ‘uncontrolled’ asthma. The aim of this study was to describe the prescribing pattern of asthma-related drugs (anti-asthmatic medications, inhalational devices, antibiotics, vaccines) among children and adolescents and examine the clinical consequences of inappropriate prescribing and lack of prescribers’ adherence to expert treatment recommendations (Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines). A retrospective longitudinal descriptive cohort study spanning 2013-2017 was conducted using health administrative data from Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (MCHP). Out of 25,732 patients receiving anti-asthmatic prescriptions with a physician confirmed asthma diagnosis, 7140 constituted the cohort of newly treated persistent asthma patients. Two-year treatment follow-up from their index date revealed that 45.53% of them failed to take any anti-asthmatic medications in their second year. Antibiotic prescriptions, particularly broad-spectrum antibiotics was common among patients with asthma as compared to non-asthmatic matched controls and were mainly prescribed for Upper Respiratory Tract Infections (URTI). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that non-compliant prescriptions defined against the expert treatment recommendations from GINA were not associated with any risk of exacerbation in two years, however patients with notable overuse of Short-Acting β-Agonist (SABA) [adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) : 1.25 (1.07-1.46) -first year; 1.57 (1.19-2.06)-second year] and lower (<50%) Inhaled Cortico Steroids to total asthma drug ratio (ICS/R03) [aOR: 2.10 (1.73-2.52)-first year; 2.50 (1.84-3.39)- second year] in both the follow-up years had higher likelihood of experiencing asthma exacerbations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.610
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics ResearchFrench-language works237,207