OPTIMIZING FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE OF FRAIL OLDER ADULTS AND THEIR CAREGIVERS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aging and age-related frailty are important public health problems. There is a need to develop rehabilitation interventions to reduce the prevalence and disabling effects of frailty. This thesis reports the rationale and design of two studies and findings of three studies aimed to optimize health outcomes of frail older adults and their caregivers. The second chapter describes the protocol of the first network meta-analysis to determine the comparative effect of interventions targeting the prevention or treatment of frailty. In the third chapter, the results of frailty network meta-analysis were presented and 89 RCTs were included. The review shows that physical activity and medication management are the most effective frailty interventions. The fourth chapter describes a protocol of pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to examine a preoperative multi-modal frailty intervention in pre-frail/frail older adults undergoing elective joint replacements. The fifth chapter describes the results of a subgroup analysis of a RCT examining the effect of complex primary care intervention to support caregivers of frail older adults. There were no differences between caregivers of frail older adults and non-caregivers in quality of life, social support, hospitalization, and emergency department visits. The sixth chapter examines the construct validity and discriminative properties of the fracture rating scale (FRS) (a tool designed for fracture risk assessment in long term care (LTC)). The FRS is a valid tool for identifying LTC residents at different risk levels for hip fracture in three Canadian provinces. The work presented in this thesis is proposing and examining the comparative effect of frailty interventions, a preoperative frailty intervention/ model, a primary care intervention to identify and support caregivers, and a predictive tool to optimize care planning of LTC residents. These findings will support the rehabilitation and care program for older adults and their caregivers and improve their health outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.062 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".