MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7061363275

Proceedings of the Fourth Pacific Trade and Development Conference : Obstacles to trade in the Pacific area

2018· book· en· W7061363275 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueANU Open Research (Australian National University) · 2018
Typebook
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrade and developmentFree tradeCurrencyInternational free trade agreementTrade barrierDeveloping countryCommercial policyLiberalizationEconomic integration
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Fourth Pacific Trade and Development Conference was held
\nin Ottawa, Canada, on October 7 to 10, 1971. The Conference program was
\noutlined in the late summer of 1970, but it proved particularly topical in the
\nwake of the currency and trade crisis following August 15, 1971.
\nAlthough the realignment of currencies agreed in December has
\neased international monetary relationships, trade problems remain. Especially
\nin the Pacific area, the potential of trade as an engine of economic growth
\nand as a basis for constructive political relationships is difficult to overemphasize.
\nThe mutuality of interests in international trade between the
\ndeveloped countries of the region is well known. Of increasing importance is
\nthe export potential and performance of developing countries in South and
\nEast Asia. The future record of industrially advanced countries in reduction
\nor control of barriers to trade affecting developing countries' exports will
\ntest the sincerity of many who have professed to favour the liberalization of
\ntrade as a stimulus to development. The willingness and ability of developed
\ncountries to adjust their industrial structure will be the major theme of the
\nFifth Trade and Development Conference scheduled for Tokyo in January,
\n1973.
\nThe Canadian host committee of the Fourth Conference in
\nreleasing the proceedings of the Conference wish to express appreciation to
\nall those who have made possible the success of the Conference and the
\npreparation of this volume. In particular, we wish to thank the public and
\nprivate financial supporters in Australia, Canada, Japan, and the United States
\nwhose assistance has been essential. We also wish to thank those students,
\nfaculty, and staff members at Carleton who helped with local arrangements
\nand the editing and preparation of the proceedings. The main responsibility
\nfor the latter task rested on Tom Burlington, who has recently gone to Japan
\nto take up employment with the International Development Center of Japan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueANU Open Research (Australian National University)Same topicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics ResearchFrench-language works237,207