REPRESENTASI QUARTER LIFE CRISIS DALAM LIRIK LAGU \nRUNTUH FEBY PUTRI FEAT FIERSA BERSARI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter Life Crisis merupakan fenomena yang marak dialami anak muda sekarang. \nFeby Putri dan Fiersa Bersari merupakan salah satu musisi di Indonesia yang ikut \nmenyuarakan fenomena Quarter Life Crisis melalui sebuah karya musik. Penelitian ini \nmengkaji fenomena Quarter Life Crisis dalam lirik lagu “Runtuh” karya Feby Putri feat Fiersa \nBersari. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah bagaimana merepresentasikan Quarter Life Crisis \nyang terkandung dalam lirik lagu “Runtuh” karya Feby Putri feat Fiersa Bersari. Penelitian \nini menggunakan teori representasi yang dikemukakan oleh Stuart Hall, dengan menggunakan \nparadigma penelitian kualitatif interpretif guna membedah unsur- unsur representasi Quarter \nLife Crisis yang terkandung dalam lirik lagu “Runtuh” karya Feby Putri feat Fiersa Bersari. \nHasil lantas membuktikan bahwa lirik lagu yang terdapat pada lagu “Runtuh” karya Feby \nPutri feat Fiersa Bersari dapat mempresentasikan tanda-tanda seseorang mengalami Quarter \nLife Crisis yaitu adanya representasi rasa kesepian, merasa terjebak dalam keadaan yang \ntidak disukai . \nKata Kunci: Representasi, Quarter Life Crisis, Lirik lagu
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.063 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".