Programme and abstracts of the 5th International Conference on Sexuality and Sexual Education: Interaction, Interdependence and Intersectionality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This book presents the 5th International Conference on Sexuality and Sexual Education: Interaction, Interdependence, and Intersectionality that was held at the Institute of Education, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal, from November 28-30, 2019. This is the fifth conference of a sequence that is held, alternately and biannually, in Portugal and Brazil, in the institutions that house a group of researchers who work collaboratively in research on sexuality and sexual education, and that constitute the network responsible for this initiative: University of Minho (UM); University of Lisbon (UL); University of Aveiro (UA); Superior School of Education of Coimbra (ESEC); Paulista State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP); the State University of Santa Catarina (UDESC). The purpose that unifies the realization of these conferences is the study of sexuality as an interdisciplinary theme that unfolds in several areas of investigation and intervention, among them sexual education. In this context, this 5th Conference focuses on a theme that reflects on one of the main current controversies in sexuality and sexuality education, by assuming as a central concern to (re) think about ways of conceptualizing, working, and investigating interaction, interdependence and intersectionality of social relations in this area. The 5th CISES was officially recognized by the Portuguese National Commission for UNESCO, Schools for Health in Europe Foundation (SHE), Association for Teacher Education in Europe (ATEE) and Portuguese Foundation the Community Against AIDS (FPCCS). During the 5th CISES there was opportunities to discuss different themes, namely: Sexuality, Health and Human rights; Sexuality, Gender, Diversity and Inclusion; Body, Eroticism and Sexuality; Research and Practices in Sexuality and Sexual Education; Sexuality, Gender and Media; Sexuality, Sexual Education and Teacher Training; Public Policies in Sexuality and Sexual Education. This international conference brought together a number of experts from universities, policy makers, researchers, teacher trainers, professionals of education (Early Childhood Educators, Teachers of Preparatory/ Basic and Secondary Schools and Higher Education), health professionals, students attending courses at higher education levels in the fields of education, sexuality or health, psychologists, sociologists and all those interested in the theme of this conference. A total of 87 proposals of Brasil, Italy, Portugal, Spain, South Africa, and the UK, have been submitted to this 5th CISES.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.166 | 0.040 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".