MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7061862984

Sexual Diversity and Institutional Change: Exploring the Process of Changing Education Systems in Alberta and Newfoundland/Labrador

2023· dissertation· en· W7061862984 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNegotiationContext (archaeology)Historical institutionalismProcess (computing)Process tracingPolicy analysisInstitutionalismPoliticsDiversity (politics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation explores how Alberta and Newfoundland/Labrador gradually changed their education systems from laggards to leaders in the context of sexual diversity. I demonstrate how these changes occurred by integrating historical institutionalism and human geography. From historical institutionalism, I draw from theories of gradual institutional change to show how policy change in each province was a continuous process that occurred over a period of time. I draw from policy feedback theory to explain how these changes happened. More specifically, I use explaining-outcome process tracing to identify policy feedback mechanisms, which provide a detailed account of policy change within the political and historical context of each province, including the networks of social relations involved and the scales from which they emerged. From human geography, I draw from theories of place as relational to theorize provincial educational policy-making as a locality in which various networks of social relations from different scales converge and negotiate how to create safe school spaces for sexually diverse students. In this way, I illustrate how the feedback mechanisms and relevant networks of social relations interact and become institutionalized through provincial educational policy-making. Applying this framework to provincial education policy, I demonstrate how Alberta and Newfoundland/Labrador’s education system gradually changed through a policy feedback process. This framework makes two theoretical contributions. The first contribution is by identifying policy feedback mechanisms to make visible the process of gradual institutional change. The second contribution is by integrating policy feedback mechanisms with place/locality as relational to demonstrate how a multi-scalar right is localized as different networks of social relations converge to negotiate how to enact this right.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0160.016
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→