MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7061863008

Rwanda Economic Update, July 2012 : Leveraging Regional Integration

2017· report· en· W7061863008 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe World Bank Open Knowledge Repository (World Bank) · 2017
Typereport
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)ThrivingGoods and servicesMomentum (technical analysis)Slow growthDebtManufacturing sectorSustainable growth rateAgricultureAnnual growth %
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rwanda grew at a rapid rate in the
\n second half of 2011, exceeding 10 percent for the first
\n time, since the 2009 global economic downturn. Overall,
\n Rwanda achieved 8.6 percent growth in 2011, and
\n substantially exceeded the average growth for Sub- Saharan
\n Africa (SSA) of 5.0 percent. Rwanda also grew fastest than
\n all the countries in the East African Community (EAC), which
\n as a group reached 6.1 percent in 2011. Robust growth
\n continued in the first quarter of 2012, when Rwanda's
\n economy expanded at 7.7 percent. Renewed concerns over the
\n global growth outlook and of the European debt crisis, might
\n negatively affect Rwanda's prospects in 2012/2013, and
\n lead to a lower growth turn-out compared to 2011. First
\n quarter growth in 2012 remained overall robust, but showed
\n considerable weakness in the industry sector. This was in
\n contrast to what was observed in the second half of 2011,
\n when industrial growth led by buoyant construction, and
\n mining activities pushed the sector to the top, ahead of
\n services. In the second half of 2011, Rwanda's growth
\n momentum accelerated largely led by thriving non-tradable
\n goods and services sectors while the manufacturing sector
\n continued to be sluggish. The Rwandan economy expanded by
\n 10.8 percent during the second half of 2011, but
\n manufacturing only contributed 0.5 percentage points to this
\n growth outcome. Agricultural output took a leap in the
\n second half, mainly due to a very good second harvest season
\n outcome. Overall, growth turn-out for 2011 stood at 8.6
\n percent, up from 7.2 percent in 2010. Inflationary pressures
\n reappeared in tandem with high international food and fuel
\n prices. The small policy response came with a delay, not
\n enough to prevent core inflation reaching its highest level
\n since mid-2009. Core inflation exceeded headline inflation
\n for the whole second half of 2011. The current account
\n deficit broadened in 2011. Rwanda's export performed
\n robustly, benefiting from high international prices, but
\n could not keep up with the increasing import bill, leading
\n to a further deterioration in the trade balance. For 2012,
\n Rwanda's economy is expected to continue to grow slower
\n than it did in 2011, but at a healthy pace. The industrial
\n sector is likely to expand less than in 2011 and growth in
\n the services sector is expected to be more moderate, both on
\n account of a more risky global environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.000
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0880.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it