Schooling and practices of freedom of 'out' queer youth on Prince Edward Island
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This MEd thesis is the first to explore PEI schooling experiences from the perspectives of\nGeneration Queer (Wells, 2012). Deploying various tools of Foucault (1983), I suggest research\nparticipants – two out youth and their mothers - demonstrated "practices of freedom" to\nchallenge the pedagogical and relational negation they encountered in hetero-centric schooling\nenvironments. To illustrate today being "a day like every other, or much more a day which is\nnever like another" (p. 359), I position 1965 as yesterday and conduct two brief genealogies of\ncriminal, medico-legal and socio-cultural discourses pertaining to sexual orientation. These\ngenealogies identify both developments and stagnations in thought with regards to\ncategorizations of sex, gender and desire. I then compare and contrast participants‘ reports of\nschooling experiences with findings from contemporary North American school climate research\n(Grace & Wells, 2009; Kosciw et al., 2012; Taylor et al., 2011). I conclude by suggesting that\nthe relationships being forged by and amongst Generation Queer represent useful examples for\nall those legislators, policy-makers, educators, parents and students committed to realizing the\ngoal that all students feel free to be who they are at school (McGuinty, 2011).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".