A report on an attendance and a presentation at “The XIX International Congress on Mathematical Physics: Young Researchers Symposium”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
新國裕昭は，重点研究費（海外短期研修費）の支援を\n受け，平成３０年７月２０日（金）・７月２１日（土）に\n国際数理物理連合(International Association on\nMathematical Physics)がカナダ・モントリオールのマ\nギル大学(McGill University)で開催した国際研究集会\n「The XIX International Congress on Mathematical\nPhysics 」(ICMP 2018) の「Young Researchers\nSymposium」(YRS)に参加し，研究の成果発表（講演タ\nイトルは「On the eigenvalue embedded in the spectral\nbands of Schrdöinger operators on carbon nanotubes\nwith impurities 」） ならびに情報収集を行った．\nISMP2018YRS では，出張者の講演以外にも最新の数理\n物理の研究発表が多く行われ，特にプリンストン大学の\nMihalis Defermos 氏によるアインシュタイン方程式に\nついての基調講演では，ブラックホールの存在に関する\n数学的説明がなされており，興味深いものであった．\n本論文では，当該研究会場にて行った研究成果を数式\nは用いずに概観的に報告する．なお，詳細の記述は，類\n似のタイトルでの論文に譲る．
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.105 | 0.042 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".