Research process with emphasis on the concept of educational management in the field of nursing: A scientometric study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and aim: Nursing is one of the most important fields in medical sciences, and its development has a great impact on health cares. Since one of the indicators of the development of any field or profession is its scientific studies; therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate scientific researches with emphasis on the concept of educational management in the field of nursing. Materials and methods: This study was conducted using a mapping method, and the scientometric analysis was performed on 2962 articles via collecting data from the Web of Science (WoS) from 2000 to 2019. The existing conceptual structure and patterns in the field of educational management researches as well as the interpretation of the relationship among the keywords used in the researches were extracted and analyzed using VOSviewer. Findings: Analysis of data obtained from WoS indicated that in the field of educational management, the number of articles had increasing trend from 2000 to 2019, indicating the interest of researchers in educational management in the field of nursing. The most cited journals were belonged to the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia, as well as to the universities of Trento, Dalhousie and Queen Mary University of London, respectively. The most international collaborations were found in publishing the high-quality articles among the United States, the United Kingdom, China, Iran and Canada. In the treasury of keywords presenting in the title and abstract of articles related to educational management, through overviewing the data obtained from scientometric mapping, it could be observed that the word “knowledge” had the most usage among the words associated with the concept of management, educational management, nursing and education. Conclusion: Based on the presented data, it can be found that firstly, the attention to the concept of educational management in the field of nursing has enhanced over time. Secondly, the concept of educational management is more integrated with mental concepts, representing the need to pay attention to mental and linguistic concepts and approaches in educational management research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.085 | 0.254 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.069 | 0.099 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".