MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7062158385

Susceptibility to tetanus and diphtheria in recently arrived adult immigrants and refugees to Montreal, Quebec

2010· dissertation· en· W7062158385 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2010
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersStrong
KeywordsDiphtheriaImmigrationSeroprevalenceTetanusRefugeeEpidemiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Adult immigrants may have been under-immunized in their countries of origin.We estimated the seroprevalence and examined risk factors for susceptibility to diphtheria and tetanus.Methods: 1480 newly-arrived adult immigrants were recruited in Montreal, 2002-2004.We collected socio-demographic information and vaccination history, and measured serum antibodies to tetanus and diphtheria by EIA to identify susceptibility, defined as ≤0.15 IU/ml and ≤0.10 IU/ml, respectively.Results: 45% (95% CI, 42%-48%) of immigrants, mean age 318.6 years, lacked immunity to either tetanus or diphtheria, ranging by region of origin (23%-79%).32% (95% CI, 30%-34%) were susceptible to tetanus and susceptibility increased with age.Susceptibility to diphtheria was less prevalent [26% (95% CI, 24%-28%)] and decreased with age.Conclusions: Many adult immigrants would benefit from diphtheria/tetanus vaccine.Susceptibility to tetanus suggests under-vaccination, while decreasing susceptibility to diphtheria with age suggests that immunity has been boosted from ongoing transmission in some countries of origin. ABRÉGÉIntroduction: Les immigrants adultes sont peut-être sous-immunisés dans leurs pays d'origine.Nous avons effectué une étude de la prévalence de la susceptibilité au tétanos et à la diphtérie et nous avons examiné les indicateurs potentiels de cette susceptibilité.Méthodes: 1480 adultes ayant immigré récemment ont été recrutés à Montréal entre 2002 et 2004.Nous avons obtenus des informations sociodémographiques et l'histoire de vaccination et nous avons mesuré les anticorps sériques contre le tétanos et la diphtérie avec le test EIA; la susceptibilité était définie comme ≤0.15 IU/ml et ≤0.10 IU/ml, respectivement.Résultats: Quarante-cinq pour cent (95% IC, 42%-48%) des immigrants, avec un âge moyen de 318.6 ans, n'étaient pas immuns soit contre le tétanos ou la diphtérie, avec des variations selon la région d'origine (23%-79%).Trente-deux pour cent (95% IC, 30%-34%) étaient susceptibles au tétanos et la susceptibilité augmentait avec l'âge.La susceptibilité à la diphtérie était moins prévalente [26% (95% IC, 24%-28%)] et diminuait avec l'âge.Conclusions: Plusieurs immigrants adultes bénéficieraient du vaccin contre le tétanos et la diphtérie.La susceptibilité au tétanos suggère la présence de sous-vaccination, tandis que la susceptibilité à la diphtérie, qui diminue avec l'âge, suggère que l'immunité a été stimulée par la transmission continue de l'infection dans certains pays d'origine.Greenaway and Dr. Kevin Schwartzman, who as a team provided a strong professional model in guiding my academic work and taught me a great deal.I am especially thankful for their continued support, encouragement, and patience, even when I became discouraged and began to lose sight of the big picture.I am also grateful towards the members of my Thesis Committee, who were helpful in giving their time and suggestions.In addition to the support provided for statistical analyses by Dr. Andrea Benedetti, Hani Kabbara was an indispensable resource for constructing the models.Also helpful were other members of the Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, who provided resources within a warm working atmosphere, and the many dedicated staff members of McGill's Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health.I wish to thank Fran, who helped me to keep an even keel, by offering many tools to cope and a committed level of support to do so.I would also like to thank my family and friends, especially my mother and Saïd, who were my emotional support.Finally,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→