Światowe tendencje w zakresie pomocy dla ofiar przestępstw
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Victimology in effect of its few dozens years of history reveals not only theoretical \nbut also practical achievments. The present article is devoted to a study \nof world tendencies observed - in that second domain, i.e. in the sphere of offering \nmateriali aid for crime victims both by a State and society. \nOn the grounds of accesible world literature the authoress makes an attempt \nat classifying the present effects of practical directions in victimology (mainly in \nthe USA, Canada., Australia and some Western European states). Presently one \ncan speak of three basic aid programs for crime victims, i.e.: \n1) the compensation program, \n2) victim-witness assistance program, \n2) victim restoration program. \nApart from necessary data on detailed tasks- of the programs the authoress \nquotes also some additional information on the newest problems of the state compensation \nfor crime victims, practical effect of the victim-witness assistance and \nthe use of restitution and other actions directed at the ,re-adaptation of crime \nvictims. At the conclusion, the world trends in that scope are presented, those \nwhich manifested themselves at the fore of the VIIth United Nations Congress on \npreventing crime and proceeding with the victims of crime. (Milan, 1985).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it