MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7062269515

Social Justice Archaeology: Historical Trauma: Boarding Schools and First Nations Reconciliation

2023· article· en· W7062269515 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Mathematics Enthusiast · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPracticumRepatriationPresentation (obstetrics)Interpretation (philosophy)Economic JusticeClass (philosophy)Work (physics)Social justice
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This panel includes 2022 Fall students of the new experimental course, ANTHROPOLOGY (ANTY) 491 - Archaeology, Identity, and Social Justice Practicum. Students in this Practicum put both classroom and theoretical learning into practice by observing and participating in a range of hands-on activities associated with UM’s anthropological collections. The aim is to share with the academic community, the practical skills and experiences used during practicum to help prepare students for work in the dynamic and ever-changing fields of anthropology and public archaeology. These fields are amid a paradigm shift where theories and values are intersecting in unpredictable ways, requiring professionals to have relationship-building and diplomatic skills, with nuanced understandings of tribal sovereignty and cultural competence. Practicum activities revolved around “real-world” challenges associated with these ongoing changes, including repatriation and reconciliation issues. Depending on the needs of each class activity, our methods changed to contextualize project’s activities carried out on campus such as the September 30, Boarding School Symposium and Tribal Historic Preservation Officer’s (THPO) visits. Class activities enriched our understanding of social justice issues in cultural heritage fields. The panel discussion begins with a brief summary presentation on the ANTY 491 practicum group work in Autumn 2022 related to the historical trauma and First Nation boarding schools; then highlight how students with different fields expertise address questions on how such differences impact interpretation of social justice issues; how forming connections with collections and repatriation work can improve health and well-being of communities; how important it is to listen and work in collaboration with fellow students and tribal colleagues; and how institutions we are affiliated with should take proactive responsibility with land acknowledgements. The significance of this practicum is to use the mundane as evidence to unravel how victims of social injustices continue to wipe tears in the journey of emotional healing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.536
Threshold uncertainty score0.583

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Mathematics EnthusiastSame topicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensingFrench-language works237,207