MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7062357968

Tax Policy And Tax Legislation In The Nigerian Upstream Oil And Gas Industry: Achieving Certainty, Clarity, Consistency and Simplicity in Tax Policy and Law Making, Interpretation and Implementation

2025· other· en· W7062357968 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSAS-Space (University of London) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTax lawTax policyLegislationJudicial interpretationTax avoidanceTax reformIndirect taxDirect taxStatute
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The subject of this research is the uncertainty in fiscal and tax policy and tax law in the Nigerian upstream petroleum tax system. The study examines how certainty, clarity, consistent understanding and simplicity in implementation may be achieved. The basic themes examined include the age and evolution of petroleum fiscal policy and tax legislation and regulations, the role of clear and consistent policy articulation and formulation, law making in the context of the Nigerian fiscal federalism and the commanding control and ownership of oil and gas resources by the federal government (FG). The critical role of structured evolution, form and substance of language, competent legislative drafting, stakeholder engagement, administration and judicial intervention in achieving these objectives are examined. Using primarily a combination of fiscal and tax policy reviews, black letter analysis of the law, review of judicial decisions and the comparative analysis of selected jurisdictions, the research advances five (5) main claims. First, is that although taxation is statute based, it reflects the social, economic, cultural values and aspirations of a people and should appropriately be reflected in the government policy and governance model. Translating these values into ascertainable fiscal and tax policy, which then get articulated and drafted into statute, present definite challenges. Second, that the principles and objectives that underpin taxation and tax systems, are not always clear or aligned and may affect or determine the level or degree of clarity, certainty, and consistency (CCC) in tax understanding, interpretation, implementation, and compliance. Third, it subscribes to the view that language and communication also present special challenges to articulating fiscal and tax policy and the drafting of tax statutes. Fourth, in terms of understanding taxing provisions, and the interpretation and implementation of taxation provisions, the tax authority, taxpayer and the courts or tribunals have significant roles to play. Fifth, the objective should be to keep statute language simple, and principle guided through competent drafting, research and engagement. Some of the questions addressed in the research include: why uncertainty arise and how this may be reduced or avoided? Also, how Nigeria’s fiscal federalism, and the exercise of legislative powers, drafting competence and reform affect the level or degree of certainty in upstream petroleum law and taxation. By comparative analysis of the design, evolution and implementation of fiscal and tax reforms in the petroleum revenue tax systems in Canada and the United Kingdom, what lessons may be learnt. Lastly, to what extent the reforms embarked on by Nigeria, resulting in the enactment of the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) 2021 has achieved certainty and simplicity in upstream petroleum taxation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it