5th EAA International Symposium on Hydroacoustics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 5th EAA International Symposium on Hydroacoustics together with domestic XXII Symposium on Hydroacoustics took place in Puck at the Sport and Training Centre DELFIN, May 16–19, 2005. The 5th EAA International Symposium on Hydroacoustics was organized by Naval Academy in Gdynia, Gda´nsk University of Technology, European Acoustic Association, Polish Acoustical Society (Gda´nsk Division) and Ultrasonic Division of the Committee on Acoustics of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Prof. Gra˙zyna Grelowska, the vice-rector of Naval Academy in Gdynia, was the chairman of the Organizing Committee. There were professors from famous European universities in the Scientific Committee. The professors arrived from, among others, Germany, Denmark, Russia, France, Italy, Greece, Turkey and Poland. The chairman of Scientific Committee was Prof. Eugeniusz Kozaczka who is the president of Polish Acoustical Society and who represents Poland in European Acoustics Association. The main aim of the symposium is giving opportunity to exchanging experiences and information among research centres dealing with underwater acoustics and ultrasound. The Symposium subject included: • sound propagation in the sea, • ambient and ship noise, • nonlinear acoustics, • ultrasonic transducers, • signal and data processing, • sonar systems, • other topics related to underwater acoustics. 70 scientists have registered to the Symposium representing research centres mainly from Poland but also from other European countries and Canada. 30 papers were presented, including 3 following invited papers: • E. Kozaczka – Modern applications of maritime technology. • A. Bobrowicz – Obrona bierna okr˛etów Marynarki wojennej RP. • I. Didenkulov, S. Muyakshin, D. Selivanovsky – Rotation of small particles in sound field and possible mechanism of sound perception. All accepted papers were published in the periodical “Hydroacoustics” vol. 8.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.119 | 0.071 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".