MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7062495304

Temperate Phage-Antibiotic Synergy

2024· dissertation· en· W7062495304 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLytic cyclePhage therapyAntibiotic resistanceTemperate climateAntibioticsBacteriophageTemperatenessAntimicrobial
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The escalating threat of antimicrobial resistance has intensified the exploration of alternative treatments, with bacteriophage (phage) therapy emerging as a potential substitute for antibiotics. While strictly lytic phages rapidly kill bacteria, temperate phages can also go dormant in their hosts. Accordingly, despite their prevalence, they are considered unsuitable for therapy. My systematic review of phage therapy in urinary tract infections (UTIs) highlighted this. This review motivated me to explore how the potential of these phages could be leveraged. Chapter 3 introduces a novel strategy to do so, exploring whether the fluoroquinolone antibiotic ciprofloxacin could synergize with temperate phages. This innovative strategy exploits the ability of the antibiotic to awaken dormant temperate phages, driving a potent synergy (≥8 log reduction) able to result in bacterial eradication. This is a potential breakthrough in the use of phages. Chapter 4 expands on this finding, establishing that a synergy exists across various drug classes with diverse mechanisms of action. Surprisingly, the synergy extends beyond antibiotics triggering the bacterial SOS-response known to wake temperate phages and also includes protein synthesis inhibitors, offering a new approach to influence the phage lysis-lysogeny decision. Chapter 5 explores the identified synergy in antibiotic-resistant models, focusing on the impact of antibiotic resistance on the effect of combining temperate phages with antibiotics. While the majority of cases demonstrated synergy comparable to the absence of antibiotic resistance, an exception was noted in the acetylation-resistant models for both gentamicin and ciprofloxacin. These resistance genes abolished synergy with the temperate phage, emphasizing the importance of the resistance mechanism within temperate phage antibiotic synergy (tPAS). In conclusion, this thesis underscores the lack of interest in temperate phages for therapy and demonstrates a scalable strategy to overcome the major barriers to their use. I uncover the mechanisms underlying the synergy and show that these concepts are applicable even in the context of resistance to the synergizing antibiotic. These findings propose a remarkable shift in how antimicrobial therapy approaches are viewed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)→Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion research→French-language works237,207→