MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7062579303

The war against terrorism in south east Asia: Singapore's framework of counter-terrorism

2005· dissertation· en· W7062579303 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUPT. Syiah Kuala University Library (Syiah Kuala University) · 2005
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerrorismPoliticsSoutheast asiaSouth asiaSpanish Civil WarWork (physics)International relationsEast Asia
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many analysts have pointed out that Southeast Asia is the 'Second Front' for terrorist operations after the September 11 incident in 2001. However, terrorism is not a new phenomenon in this region. The September 11, 2001 attacks by Al Qaeda had enormous and unanticipated consequences for the international system; a protracted international conflict has been re-introduced to the world since the end of the Cold War, it also signalled a new type of threat by non-state actors to governments and civilians, and called into doubts regarding the capacities and abilities of the governments, as well as the many accepted security and administrative practices; lastly, the attacks also highlighted that political, economic, social and cultural differences between various regions of the world can be translated into violence (Foreign Affairs, Canada, 2002). When Southeast Asia was named the 'Second Front' by the United States, and with the discovery Jemaah Islamiya in Singapore after the September 11 attacks, governments have noticed that regional cooperation is essential for countering transnational terror cells (Simon, 2003: 1). Interstate cooperation has centered on the Singapore-Malaysia-Indonesia nexus. September 11 has led to a new phase of counter-terrorism campaign in Southeast Asia with two main components: intra-regional cooperation and their collaboration with Western powers, chiefly the United States (Acharya, 2004: 141). Southeast Asian governments have recognised that regional cooperation is essential for countering transnational terrorism. However, interstate cooperation has faces a number of constraints due to the different perspectives and political restrictions of different countries, therefore making it difficult to work out a common response. Nevertheless, Southeast Asian governments have taken important steps to combat terrorism reducing the vulnerability of the region to terrorism (Australian Government, 2004: 61).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.018
Scholarly communication0.0120.009
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUPT. Syiah Kuala University Library (Syiah Kuala University)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207