MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7062732622

Using Whole Genome Sequencing to Track Colibacillosis on Saskatchewan Broiler Flocks

2022· dissertation· en· W7062732622 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Generation Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasmidEscherichia coliFlockVirulenceWhole genome sequencingPathogenic Escherichia coliNanopore sequencingOutbreak
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Colibacillosis is a systemic infection caused by Escherichia coli resulting in significant morbidity and mortality in broiler flocks worldwide. Little is known about the group of E. coli that cause colibacillosis, collectively termed avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC). My MSc research focused on determining how APEC differ from resident E. coli that live in the chicken gut but do not cause disease. I hypothesized that systemic and cecal E. coli are genetically distinct, and E. coli that cause colibacillosis are virulent outbreak strains. My objectives were to isolate E. coli from Saskatchewan broilers, sequence their genomes using Nanopore and Illumina technology, and screen them for virulence, antimicrobial resistance, and disinfectant resistance. I developed a pipeline to isolate and sequence E. coli from Saskatchewan colibacillosis outbreaks, selecting isolates based on outbreak, disease status, and biofilm profiles. I sequenced 96 E. coli isolates, consisting of 58 from diseased broilers with confirmed colibacillosis (systemic E. coli), and 38 from the cecal contents of healthy broilers in the same flocks (cecal E. coli). Our initial experiments were optimized for whole genome assembly and excluded DNA fragments under 500bp; therefore, we likely missed plasmids present in E. coli isolates. I tested six plasmid kits and two sequencing protocols to develop a methodology to capture missed plasmids in avian E. coli isolates and successfully identified new plasmids in both types of isolates. Systemic E. coli were more drug-resistant than cecal E. coli against a panel of 27 antimicrobial agents and possessed significantly more plasmids than cecal E. coli. plasmids contained multiple virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes that may contribute to disease. Since biofilms can provide protection from antibiotics and disinfectants, I quantified biofilm formation in three different medias. Systemic isolates were significantly more likely to form biofilms in rich media, but there was no correlation between biofilm formation and antimicrobial resistance. My characterization led us to conclude that systemic and cecal E. coli represent two different populations of strains. This will need to be confirmed with the analysis of more isolates. Characterization of avian pathogenic E. coli will help us understand how these isolates cause disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicAdvanced Power Generation TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207