University of Leicester Student Law Review 11, vol. 2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This volume of the Review touches on such topics as the digital evolution of testamentary dispositions during the global pandemic, the need for reform inthe current version of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, and the challenges of diversifying the Canadian Judicial Appointments system. Our award-winning essays include winners from the Victoria Fisher Memorial Prizes, the ELSA x Tech Law Essay Competition, and the Juliet Humphries and Michael Humphries QC Award. <br> <h3>Table of Contents</h3> <br> 1. To Dispense or Not to Dispense, That is the Question… Meera Amari Chauhan Page 1-7 <br> 2. Deprivation of Citizenship: Discrimination Against Dual Citizens following the Begum Ruling Abdul Rahman Tarwala Page 8-12 <br> 3. Rape, Reform, and the Sexual Offences Act 2003 Lorne Richardson Page 13-19 <br> 4. An Appraisal of Social Justice and Social Inequality Dilemmas Exacerbated by the English Criminal Justice System Nea Tank Page 20-25 <br> 5. Canada’s Commitment to a Clean Environment: How Climate Change Affects All Aarti Panchal Page 26-30 <br> 6. Illusionary Protections: The Ostensible Victory of the Sparrow case Corrigan Goodwin and Stephanie Statia Page 31-35 <br> 7. Is Canada’s Judicial Appointment System Lacking Transparency and Diversity? Judicial Appointments: A Partisan Reward Stephanie Statia Page 36-38 <br> 8. The Effective Enforcement of EU Law through the Preliminary Ruling Procedure – Article 267 TFEU Ana Sofia Banús Page 39-42 <br> <h4>Competition-Winning Essays</h4> <br> 1. Family Matters – Women, Queerness, and the (Nuclear) Family Law Anonymous, Winner of the Victoria Fisher Memorial Prize (2021) Page 43-48 <br> 2. ‘Feeble Minded’ Women with ‘Prostitute Minds’ – The Case for Decriminalising Abortion and Female Self-Rule Frances Hand, Winner of the Victoria Fisher Memorial Prize (2021) Page 49-59 <br> 3. The Common Sense of Law Marta Baluczynska, Winner of the Juliet Humphries and Michael Humphries QC Award (2022) Page 60-62 <br> 4. Mitigating Algorithmic Manipulation Corrigan Goodwin, Winner of the TechLaw Society x ELSA x LSLR Essay Competition, Sponsored by Eversheds Sutherland (2022) Page 62-66 <br> <br>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.452 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".